![]() Yea, AutoCAD is huge for Civil Engineers and Matlab is also pretty big for many engineering students, academics, and research professionals. And I don't think it would be until then that open source dev tools follow more diy fpga. ![]() With Moore's law running down there may be more and more things that aren't possible without fpga. If you wait several generations or are ok with reduced performance then you can stick with generic CPU/GPU. ![]() I think the reason this is so far down the line is because fpga offers cutting edge performance for specialized applications. It used to be pretty difficult to make a custom PCB, but now with PCB as a service open tools are seeing more use. But if fab and design tools of the chips themselves become a commodity then there will be open source dev tools. This one is almost certainly much further down the road than any of the other options. If there was an analogue of ARM in the FPGA world that could open up open source dev tools too.Ģ) DIY FPGA. The fact that FPGAs are proprietary designs and can't be copied is a significant barrier. I think there are two other potential ways FPGA tools could become open source:ġ) If there are some widely used open hardware devices or open standards. Not that my opinion matters, but if he can manage to do it by open sourcing Wolfram Language, Wolfram Engine, or something like that, while keeping his business intact, I might again consider him to be the genius he was lauded to be in his 20s. I think Wolfram needs to think quite hard about how he wants to get his technology in the hands of developers while maintaining a business. There is a market for proprietary developer tools, but it had been dwindling since its prime-time in the 90s. HOW TO DOWNLOAD WOLFRAM 1.14.4 SOFTWAREMost software is grounded in an open source development and deployment tool chain. ) But that’s completely at odds with how most software engineers work these days. (wxMaxima is rough to use, Axiom has 3 or 4 different forks, each with fewer than 10 developers, SymPy just isn’t there, Sage is absolutely wonderful but not polished or easy to deploy. Maybe it’s true all of the successful and wildly popular computer algebra systems are closed source. Wolfram believes that mathematics software (or “computational knowledge” or whatever he calls his entire enterprise now) must be proprietary and paid-for in order to exist. Even if the engine is “free”, I don’t want to build an open source product with it and hope to be granted a “free production license.” If I build something on my own time I don’t want to ask my employer to purchase a “production license” as soon as it becomes useful.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |